KEYWORDS: Field Control Therapy, Bioresonance testing, Laboratory testing, Functional medicine testing

Field Control Therapy® – Many Lab Tests for Many Diseases and One Test that Can Do It All.

by Savely Yurkovsky, MD

While diagnostic testing does remain a necessary step toward right treatment in order to solve disease, it, paradoxically, can be just as much of an obstacle to and diversion from it.

According to key scientific principles for solving scientific problems, which unfortunately elude conventional and alternative medical training, there are several major reasons for this diversion. One is that while the sick body can generate literally thousands of abnormal findings, which all fall into some general content of disease, science is little impressed with such bulk data and even deems it as unnecessary and confusing. Says one of the world authorities in science of water physics, Professor of Bioengineering Jerry Pollack, PhD: “The objective of science is not to add layers of interpretational complexity with each discovery, but to collapse layers of apparent complexity into a few simple governing principles. Once these have been identified, a seemingly complex array of phenomena will fall into place simply.”¹

But in order for these to fall into place simply, Israeli-born David Deutsch, PhD, professor of physics at Cambridge University and a pioneer in quantum computers, emphasizes that “understanding of scientific problems depends more on its knowledge structure (e.g., high priorities) than its content or sheer volume.”² Likewise, MIT physics professor and expert in decision science George Pugh, PhD, states that it is only a few properly chosen factors of primary value or importance that can lead to the best solutions, stressing that simple models of low detail yet of high strategic importance automatically address far more information than mere high volumes of details.³ These few quotes confirm the medical liabilities when the structure and importance of knowledge are missing in medical practice and, instead, it is being ruled and impressed with just volumes of content, which lead only to chaos and failures. Say prominent cancer researchers, after spending at least a trillion dollars in the search of cure: “The terabytes of data produced by cancer research could be too much of a good thing until we figure out better ways to manage the information.”⁴

Says Stuart Firestein, professor and chairman of biological sciences at Columbia University, “Even papers in immunology or cell biology mystify me—and so do some papers in my own field, neurobiology.” These findings also concern abnormal tests, yet he and his colleagues have been giving up on the papers because these “will continue boring your eyes out of their sockets, unless scientists fall back on another strategy for coping with the mountain of information.”⁵ Says world-renowned Israeli brain researcher, Professor Henry Markram, MD: “…although researchers worldwide are publishing tens of thousands of neuroscience studies every year, neither our understanding of basic brain functions nor our ability to treat brain disorders seemed to be progressing much.”⁶ Other researchers in chronic diseases, except for a few, yo-yo type, sound just as dejected.

As a practical example to these and to the fact that I have seen countless patients over the years whose stacks of lab reports approached the size of Egyptian pyramids while their cures remained invisible, I wish to use one of the recent typical books which seems to particularly impress with so many medical tests followed by their many based treatments. The book in question: Why Can’t I Get Better? Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease by Richard I. Horowitz, MD (New York: St Martins Pr., 2014. Print.). While giving credit to the book for correctly approaching Lyme disease not as merely infectious but as a chronic complex disease it, in my opinion, has inadvertently followed to the letter all of the typical mistakes which are committed in the management of chronic diseases—starting with the listed laboratory tests with the total number of about a hundred, including those from functional medicine that are in vogue for now. This quote from the book seems to offer credence to both ordered tests and treatments: BLOCK QUOTE

According to the Institute for Functional Medicine, functional medicine is a science-based healthcare approach that assesses and treats underlying causes of illness through individually tailored therapies to restore health and improve function. One of the ways we do this is by looking at nutritional and metabolic profiles that address the various organ systems of the body. END QUOTE

However, alleged “underlying causes of illness” were inadvertently mistaken with only more abnormal lab findings, which represent just a set of symptoms expressed in a different technical impressive language: “nutritional”, “metabolic”, “energetic,” or any other. These are produced in chronic diseases, with no end in sight, while generating the same volume of findings which the aforementioned scientists have already given up on.

But the main reason why functional medicine, as any approach that relies on lab testing, cannot determine “underlying causes of illness” is simply because scientific literature has already admitted to the fact that biochemical testing is incapable of establishing them. It is because underlying causes, whether environmental pollutants such as mercury, lead, pesticides and other, or infectious agents such as Lyme, fungal, parasitic or other infections, commonly reside in the internal organs which are inaccessible to routine lab testing. Yet, the common, more-superficial-and-accessible-to-lab-tests, bodily fluids cannot adequately reflect this presence. From here, this diagnostic computer virus inevitably leads to the next one, such as “individually tailored therapies to restore health,” or an automatic oxymoron because truly effective individually tailored therapies must be based on their true ability to match, remove, or effectively address the actual causes of disease. Otherwise, these treat just other sets of symptoms. Not surprisingly, the Textbook of Functional Medicine and many similar books serve as the best sources of expert witnesses against their own statements.

From this Lyme book to an alleged autism revolution book by Harvard autism specialist, Martha Herbert, MD, PhD, who, as all pharmaceutically-minded doctors, proposes functional medicine testing and treatments for autism, to the Textbook of Functional Medicine itself, I could not find a single case of any chronic disease, Lyme, autism, or other that was reversed or cured through this or other biochemical-pharmaceutical approaches. (The treatment of cancer is a different issue, in some ways, at least). Not surprisingly, Dr. Horowitz has admitted himself, at a Lyme meeting in Danbury, Connecticut, in May of 2014, that his Lyme ‘literate’ method cannot cure chronic Lyme disease.

Below is one of the real case examples of another chronic disease, autism, which was originally tested through a warehouse of tests suggesting a warehouse of treatments. The marks against these tests, reflecting positive or negative results, were made by the mother of this child, with her email following.

MESSY LAB REPORT HERE.

Dear Dr Yurkovsky,

My son was diagnosed with PDD and we went to a DAN doctor. Blood tests showed:

• gene mutation called compound heterozygous MTHFR and as a result inability to process group B vitamins (the results came just for B12),

• casein intolerance,

• bacteria overgrowth (mycoplasma and Lyme),

• diphtheria virus positive,

• myelin antibodies positive,

• high level of copper and zinc.

The following protocol was suggested:

• MB12 shots, omega fish oil, probiotic, multivitamin. No cow’s milk.

• Chelation

• Allergy test (needles)

• MRIs

• Antibiotic treatment for Lyme and mycoplasma. END LETTER/QUOTE

Following this sophisticated evaluation, the parents have opted for FCT. No tests besides bio-resonance testing were performed, and all of the above biomedical tests were left up to the boy’s own body to confirm their corresponding value. No treatment besides FCT’s homeopathic approach and addressing destructive electromagnetic radiation through reduction in exposure and protection with Memon technology was carried out. His treatment did not address either the alleged Lyme, mycoplasma, MTHFR misfiring gene, and most of other reported lab findings. Yet, it did address what his brain, immune, gastrointestinal, and other organs indicated as important to their dysfunction: parasites, mercury, toxic metals, EMF, candidiasis, vaccinosis. The end result speaks better for itself than my or anybody’s tests, as formulated in this official assessment of a pediatric neurologist and neurodevelopmental specialist, removing the diagnosis of autism from the boy: BLOCK QUOTE

Examination: What was immediately obvious was that he no longer fulfills criteria for a diagnosis of autism as his eye contact and joint attention was quite appropriate. He certainly can interact appropriately when he chooses to do so. Formulation: Daniel is an almost five-year-old young man with a past history of autism and learning difficulties. After reviewing all pertinent medical and education records, it is clear that Daniel has made remarkable progress and no longer fulfills criteria for a diagnosis of autism. In addition, his academic and social skills have improved and he is doing quite well in an integrated preschool setting. END QUOTE

Conclusion:

This concrete medical example from FCT medical practice speaks better than the thousand words, that even the most elaborate laboratory tests and treatments can be avoided when the high volumes of information in disease are superseded by high-value information instead.

Notes

1. Pollack GH. Cells, Gels, and the Engines of Life. Seattle, WA; Ebner & Sons:2001.

2. Deutsch D. The Fabric of Reality. Harmondsworth, Middx., Engl.; Penguin: 1998.

3. Pugh GE. The Biological Origin of Human Values. New York, NY;Basic Books:1977.

4. Nature. May 29, 2014; vol 509.

5. Firestein S. What Science Wants to Know. Scientific American. April 2012.

6 Theil S. Why the Human Brain Project Went Wrong—and How to Fix It: Two years in, a $1-billion-plus effort to simulate the human brain is in disarray. Was it poor management, or is something fundamentally wrong with Big Science? Scientific American. October 2015.

About the Author

Savely Yurkovsky, MD, has evolved a novel medical model that interfaces important knowledge from biology, medicine, toxicology, and physics. Its primary focus is on the most important aspect of chronic diseases – its causes – along with the most effective diagnostic and therapeutic means to address these. This has transformed the often-imprecise medical interventions into a far more effective, exact, and predictable science. He has founded a teaching organization, “SYY Integrated Health Systems, Ltd.,” which provides training in this medical system under the concept of FCT®, Field Control Therapy. This concept as medicine of the future was suggested by Professor Emeritus of Materials Science at Stanford University, William A Tiller, PhD. Dr. Yurkovsky has presented this system at many professional symposia in both the US and Europe, including the annual Bio-terrorism 2005 conference: “Unified Science & Technology for Reducing Biological Threats & Countering Terrorism” with affiliation to the Homeland Security Office and Harvard Medical School, among others. Dr. Yurkovsky was nominated for the prestigious Bravewell Leadership Award for “significant contributions to the field of medicine” and “compelling vision for the future of medicine” in 2005. He has authored numerous articles and the book The Power of Digital Medicine that was endorsed by prominent scientists from MIT, Columbia, and Stanford Universities and contributed a chapter on homeopathy to the textbook Integrative Gastroenterology, edited by the Chief of Integrative Gastroenterology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Gerard Mullin, MD. Dr. Yurkovsky maintains a private practice in Chappaqua, New York.