Why Does the Origin of the Covid-19 Virus Continue to Be Such a Rancorous Dispute?
An investigative report published by Vanity Fair on March 31, based on release of hundreds of thousands of documents obtained by the Freedom of Information Act, details the ongoing dueling of those who think SARS-CoV-2 spilled over from bat to human versus those who think laboratory experimentation went awry accidentally or intentionally.1 In June of 2021 an evolutionary biologist, Jeremy Bloom, who had completed a paper examining viral genomic sequencing, discovered that some of the earliest SARS-CoV-2 sequences discussed in Chinese studies were missing from databases, including the one at the NIH. Bloom thought that the sequences had disappeared without a trace and that the Chinese government sought to delete the sequences to avert any suspicion that China played a role in causing the pandemic. He had determined that the NIH removed the sequence data following a request by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Bloom had notified the NIH about his pre-print wanting their input as to why the viral sequences had been removed.










0 Comments