FCT ® in the coronary care unit of a University Hospital and heart matters

By Savely Yurkovsky, MD

As the heart disease retains its infamous leadership in killing Americans, the following cases suggest that this leadership might be owed to the very main paradigm, chemical-pharmaceutical medicine, that is attempting to solve it.

FCT saving my 92 year old mom from the hands of scientific cardiologists

In the spring of 2015, my vigorous 92-year-old mother, a Boston resident, slipped and fractured her hip. Following this, she received excellent care from an orthopedic surgeon and medical staff in a local university teaching hospital. The surgeon marveled, how fast she was healing, and I skipped telling him that this was likely due to homeopathic Arnica, received prior to the surgery. Yet, her subsequent recovery was suddenly derailed due to an IV fluid overload following the surgery. Between this, 92-year-old heart with aortic valve stenosis that has become a big problem, under the circumstances, the domino effect ended up in a heart attack and congestive heart failure. She began gasping for breath and was transferred to the CCU, where high doses of diuretic and other medications, were administered 24/7. Among these was a beta-blocker drug because, in spite of its known side effects of causing congestive heart failure due to reducing heart rate and contraction, some study showed that due to these actions there was somewhat better survival rate among congestive heart failure patients by, allegedly, sparing the heart muscle from wearing itself out faster. While, I knew that such benefit, even if for real, could be clearly detrimental particularly in elderly people whose heart contraction is already weaker, I decided to play a Good Joe to her heart specialists team and see the benefit for myself. And the team treated me as such. The only problem was that neither this comradery nor the slew of drugs were doing little to end the crisis, which kept progressing. Her lungs sounded more congested, the chest x-rays looked too, breathing more labored, all in spite of increasing doses of a diuretic orally and IV. Logistically, I started sensing a reality of my mother dying by heroic scientific death, thanks to a piece of paper with some beta-blocker study on it. Indeed, my bio-resonance testing* was confirming a severe intolerance of this drug, by her heart. Since the combination of myocardial infarction, severe aortic stenosis and persistent congestive heart failure carries a very high mortality rate, even among much younger people, never mind the seniors in their 90s, I diplomatically suggested to the team’s head attending cardiologist, that the beta-blocker be reduced or, better, stopped.

Following this, I apparently stripped myself of a Good Joe immunity and was told in less than a cordial manner, that based on high scientific standards of evidence based medicine, as supported by that “positive study,” that the drug was clearly a lifesaver for mom and, also, If I am so smart, I should take over my mother’s care, myself. But to prove me outright ignorant in the matter he will dispatch the ultimate judge in the field, some big specialist in congestive heart failure. The next day, as my mother continued struggling and, likely, making reservations in Heaven for herself, the dispatched big specialist charged in, with a small army of subordinates. In no time she issued the same scientific verdict, that the beta-blocker was clearly the best thing that ever happened in my mom’s life. “We have a study, the real evidence,” said the specialist, “that proves you wrong”. Excuse me doctor, for a naive question,” but was my mother or other 92-year olds with a myocardial infarction, severe aortic stenosis and congestive heart failure a part of this study?” Short silence followed, as the herd mentality can neither handle nor tolerate anything that even faintly resembles individualized medical care. They simply get lost as if struck by a foreign language. “We will continue the beta-blocker,” uttered through her teeth the specialist, storming out of the room. “We are discontinuing the beta-blocker,” I advised my mother’s nurse, seconds later, exercising my legal right as her health proxy. Yet, following my bold move, the next day did not bring no roses, as my mother remained just as breathless. The showed up attending cardiologist, helped matters little when after being told of what I did, he refused to hear further update on mom’s condition, obviously as a complete waste of time for such a hopeless basket case, under the circumstances. This didn’t do much good to my brother’s spirits, who has witnessed the entire ordeal, for days. “Are you sure you know what you are doing?,” he asked gingerly, while seeing little gain from losing scientific community support. “I hope I am,” I uttered while resuming bio-resonance testing in a hope to find the next cause of the stubborn problem. However, the good old test did not show anything new but still the same old villain, beta-blocker, impairing mom’s heart. It was either still circulating in her blood or remained in her heart muscle. Next step: treat poison with same poison, but only in its energetic form in order to help the body to finally part with the drug or any toxin or infection. After a good nurse has supplied me with the real one, I prepared its energetic counterpart. Done. Yet, still no parade that day, either, but the same struggle. However, the next day brought the first signs of hope as mom looked less breathless and her lungs no longer sounded like Niagara Falls. Her blood oxygen level jumped up, heart rate came down indicating its decreased stress state. The next 24 hours were all good news: IV diuretic was discontinued, the oral one decreased and the chest x-ray has, finally, looked clean. The next morning, she left CCU for the rehab facility, to work out her hip.

Today, at the age, 95, mom is doing well. Unfortunately, and ironically, just a year following her ordeal her much younger attending cardiologist who deemed her to be hopeless died. Speaking of another piece of heart ‘science’, for many years mom had high cholesterol in a hefty 300 range, for which her local internist kept pushing statins. Yet, she never took them, upon my unscientific advice to ignore and never even bother checking cholesterol, as I don’t mine, and just keep doing FCT. Perhaps just as ironically, a recent analysis declared failure of the conventional medical gold standard, evidence based medicine, to meet its high expectations for medical practice.¹

When Statins Kill?

In my book, The Power of Digital Medicine, I presented a case of a heart patient who ignored the bio-resonance testing findings that a cholesterol lowering drug was harming his liver. “I feel good and my cardiologist said the drug was necessary, why listen to some strange test,” was the reaction. Yet, months later he no longer felt good and was delivered by an ambulance with intense pain in his liver, to an ER where blood test and diagnosis confirmed the harm. After drug was stopped he gradually recovered. However, in this tragic case of an 80 year old man, there was no recovery.

This case was even more tragic because as he was aging, under FCT care, he was gaining vigor, being full of energy, working full time job and wanting to buy a Harley Davidson motorcycle, at a tender age of 78. However, after dropping out of FCT maintenance visits, he returned with a very unusual for his age disease, acute myelocytic leukemia, that normally strikes young children. His son, biological dentist and a patient of mine, said that the oncologist prognosis was 6-8 weeks survival. My bio-resonance testing detected general environment pollutants and statin drug in his bone marrow and he received their homeopathic-energetic counterparts. Since the patients on long term FCT very rarely develop cancer or any serious diseases, I examined his chart for possible oversight, on my part. Yet, instead, I have found just the opposite, warning him decades back that bio-resonance testing red-flagged his statin drug as harming him. Unfortunately, the same logic, “my cardiologist said it was necessary”, prevailed, again. Not to force a patient into something uncomfortable and scary for him and for liability reasons, I didn’t press the issue further. Which facts made me suspect that it was the statin, even more than pollutants, that caused this leukemia?

1. Finding any toxin in the bone marrow in the presence of its overt disease links it to that disease.

2. Following the first two remedies, his oncologist (not being aware of FCT treatment, due to the family wish) stated that the leukemia displayed an unusual (e.g., for chemotherapy alone) regression.

3. Following the next bio-resonance retesting, only the statin was still detected in the bone marrow, which speaks for its deep poisonous nature for the organ.

4. As a clinical confirmation to this, after a stronger homeopathic-energetic statin, his oncologist reported that the leukemia displayed a further dramatic regression

5. While seemingly paradoxically, my search on statins and bone marrow showed just the opposite, their potential to prevent this very leukemia by suppressing the corresponding triggering genetic mechanisms! yet, a science of hormesis puts a different spin on all pharmaceuticals, conventional and alternative, through its nasty rule of “the dose makes the poison.” Thereby, a beneficial substance may suddenly become a poison, based on cumulative effect, and cause the same disease that it seems to prevent in a lab. And vice versa, that minute poisons may heal. Did the statin at some point become too much of a good thing for that anti-leukemia pathway and caused the very disease it was supposed to prevent? Very likely! If not, why then, it did not prevent his leukemia?

6. What sealed the verdict, this unusual for adults and, particularly, elderly ? leukemia peaked and continued to grow in incidence within a year after statins were introduced in the 1980s!

Following his unusual progress, I pleaded with the family to convince his oncologists to back off from the usual high dose chemotherapy protocol, because the bone marrow natural recovery on FCT and organ, itself, will be destroyed by it more than leukemia. However, as usual, the herd mentality prevailed and they said it was necessary to prevent the usual recurrence of leukemia, based on their books. This has ultimately killed him, as his poisoned by the drugs bone marrow could not produce sufficient white blood cells to resist vicious strains of common hospital infections and he died of pneumonia. Instead of the expected 6-8 weeks, he lived almost a year.

Reversed heart disease, without heart medications

A reader may review my published in this periodical report of an FCT patient with known coronary artery disease, severe diabetes, obesity, and junk food consumer who without any heart medications or supplements, surprisingly displayed clean heart arteries.²

Adding more paradoxes, for our scientific cardiovascular medicine, the recent studies have demonstrated decreased mortality rates, among acute myocardial infarction patients, when interventional cardiologists leave town.³ Another one that an average cardiologist does not even know what a healthy heart diet is.⁴

The bottom line, as in any disease, addressing well its real causes remains the ultimate science.

1. Horwitz, et al., From Evidence Based Medicine to Medicine Based, Volume 130, No. 11

2. TSLD Article, FCT documented case of an apparently reversed heart disease in a junk food addict with obesity and diabetes, thanks to cause-based approach to chronic diseases

3. Jena, et al., Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality During Dates of National Interventional Cardiology Meetings, Journal of the American Heart Association 2018

4. Stephen Devries, et al, A Deficiency of Nutrition Education and Practice in Cardiology, (AJM vol. 130, No. 11, Nov. 2017)

About the Author

Savely Yurkovsky, MD, a pediatrician, internist and cardiologist, has evolved a novel medical model that interfaces important knowledge from biology, medicine, toxicology and physics. Its primary focus is on the most important aspect of chronic diseases – its causes – along with the most effective diagnostic and therapeutic means to address these. This has transformed the often-imprecise medical interventions into a far more effective, exact and predictable science. He has founded a teaching organization, “SYY Integrated Health Systems, Ltd.,” which provides training in this medical system under the concept of FCT®, Field Control Therapy. This concept as medicine of the future was suggested by Professor Emeritus, of Materials Science at Stanford University, William A Tiller, PhD. He has presented it at many professional symposia in both the U.S. and Europe, including the annual Bio-terrorism 2005 conference: “Unified Science & Technology for Reducing Biological Threats & Countering Terrorism” with affiliation to the Homeland Security Office, and Harvard Medical School, among others. Dr. Yurkovsky has been nominated for the prestigious Bravewell Leadership Award for “significant contributions to the field of medicine” and “compelling vision for the future of medicine,” in 2005. He has authored numerous articles and the book, “The Power of Digital Medicine” that was endorsed by prominent scientists from MIT, Columbia and Stanford Universities and contributed a chapter on homeopathy to the textbook of Integrative Gastroenterology edited by the Chief of Integrative Gastroenterology department at Johns Hopkins University medical school, Gerard Mullin, MD. Dr. Yurkovsky maintains a private practice with a cause-based approach to diseases, covering these from pediatrics to geriatrics, located in Chappaqua, New York.